I can’t remember why I started reading all the comments on the article titled “Over a decade later, climate scientist prevails in libel case” (on Ars Technica). But there was a pearl to be found there, so I’m glad I did read on. There it was: a suggestion concerning a certain category of Internet usernames, stating that “Usernames indicating a participant’s predilection towards exercising careful thought, valid reasoning, or sound judgement, are reliable warning signs that their actual contributions will prove to be otherwise.“
It remains to be seen whether this law can only be applied to discussion forum names, or if it as more generally applicable. And perhaps it might need a bit of rephrasing to be 100% exact ;-) But I can say that it appears to be true in many languages, not just in English.
Anyway, I propose to call this law “Verda’s Law of Internet User Names“. Thank you for your insight, Bernardo!
PS. Albert Einstein is suposed to have said: “Common sense is the sum of all prejudices that we acquire up to out 18th year“. Meaning that there is no real knowledge in common sense, right?
You must be logged in to post a comment.